- MKA comprises 200 tasks across 10 industries and 83 occupations, each mirroring 3-8 hours of expert work
- Rubrics average ~70 checks weighted 75% factual accuracy and 25% visual design, with 96% agreement between automated and expert grading
- All models run on the open-source Stirrup harness; Gemini 4 Carbon ranked second at roughly one-sixth the per-task cost of the leader
AI CURATED HOT STORY · 11/11/2026
DeepMind Unveils MKA Benchmark to Evaluate AI Agents on Professional Visual Tasks
Google DeepMind, in collaboration with Artificial Analysis, has launched the Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark to evaluate AI agents on real-world professional visual tasks. The benchmark comprises 200 private, real-world tasks across 10 industries, requiring agents to interpret complex visual inputs such as architectural blueprints, engineering diagrams, and clinical scans, and to produce deliverables like slide decks, tables, and reports. It fills a gap in existing evaluations for professional scenarios like blueprint cross-referencing and scientific chart reading.
MKA employs a dual-track expert scoring system (Climb and Regression) with an average of about 70 weighted criteria per task, emphasizing authentic visual complexity and domain specificity over simplified synthetic data. Results show Claude Sonnet 5.5 leading in areas such as healthcare, though its advantage in legal and government domains is marginal. Gemini 4 Carbon ranks second, with an average cost per task six times lower than the top model, demonstrating significant cost-effectiveness.
The launch marks a shift in multimodal agent evaluation from general capabilities to vertical professional scenarios, providing developers with a tool that closely mirrors real workflows. As AI agents penetrate knowledge work, MKA is poised to become an industry standard, driving improvements in visual understanding, cross-domain reasoning, and deliverable generation, while influencing enterprise adoption and cost-benefit trade-offs.
Hourly heat curve
12 fully observed hoursThe line compares only sources observed throughout; gap hours are interpolated to keep the trend continuous.
Coverage timeline
Total 4 reports · Latest first- IT之家 · 智能时代T2·78 pts
- Artificial AnalysisT1·62 pts
- MKA contains 200 private real-world visual tasks across 10 industries
- Tasks require producing slide decks, spreadsheets, and reports from dense visual inputs like schematics and scans
- The benchmark emphasizes visual complexity and domain specificity over simplified synthetic inputs
- Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)T1·58 pts
- MKA targets real professional visual tasks like blueprint cross-referencing and scientific chart reading, unlike text-only evaluations
- Gemini 4 Carbon ranks second at one-sixth the average cost per task of the top model
- The benchmark was co-built by DeepMind and Artificial Analysis and is now integrated into the Artificial Analysis platform
- Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)T1·72 pts
- MKA comprises 200 private real-world visual tasks across 10 industries, where inputs are genuinely required rather than supplementary context
- Grading uses Climb and Regression expert criteria, averaging about 70 weighted items per task
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads Healthcare and narrowly leads Law & Government