HOT RADAR
agentHEAT 50.8°

AI CURATED HOT STORY · 11/11/2026

DeepMind Unveils MKA Benchmark to Evaluate AI Agents on Professional Visual Tasks

4 reports archived3 independent sourcesupdated 11/11/2026, 06:48:50
Synthesis & Latest Updates
3 Sources Cross-Validated

Google DeepMind, in collaboration with Artificial Analysis, has launched the Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark to evaluate AI agents on real-world professional visual tasks. The benchmark comprises 200 private, real-world tasks across 10 industries, requiring agents to interpret complex visual inputs such as architectural blueprints, engineering diagrams, and clinical scans, and to produce deliverables like slide decks, tables, and reports. It fills a gap in existing evaluations for professional scenarios like blueprint cross-referencing and scientific chart reading.

MKA employs a dual-track expert scoring system (Climb and Regression) with an average of about 70 weighted criteria per task, emphasizing authentic visual complexity and domain specificity over simplified synthetic data. Results show Claude Sonnet 5.5 leading in areas such as healthcare, though its advantage in legal and government domains is marginal. Gemini 4 Carbon ranks second, with an average cost per task six times lower than the top model, demonstrating significant cost-effectiveness.

The launch marks a shift in multimodal agent evaluation from general capabilities to vertical professional scenarios, providing developers with a tool that closely mirrors real workflows. As AI agents penetrate knowledge work, MKA is poised to become an industry standard, driving improvements in visual understanding, cross-domain reasoning, and deliverable generation, while influencing enterprise adoption and cost-benefit trade-offs.

LATEST/The MKA benchmark is now integrated into the Artificial Analysis platform. Initial results show Claude Sonnet 5.5 leading in healthcare and other domains, while Gemini 4 Carbon ranks second at one-sixth the cost. The benchmark emphasizes real-world visual complexity and domain specificity, with plans to expand industry tasks and dynamically update scoring criteria.

Hourly heat curve

12 fully observed hours
Now
50.8
Peak
58.807:00
24h change
–

The line compares only sources observed throughout; gap hours are interpolated to keep the trend continuous.

Coverage timeline

Total 4 reports · Latest first
  1. IT之家 · 智能时代T2·78 pts
    • MKA comprises 200 tasks across 10 industries and 83 occupations, each mirroring 3-8 hours of expert work
    • Rubrics average ~70 checks weighted 75% factual accuracy and 25% visual design, with 96% agreement between automated and expert grading
    • All models run on the open-source Stirrup harness; Gemini 4 Carbon ranked second at roughly one-sixth the per-task cost of the leader
  2. Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)T1·58 pts
    • MKA targets real professional visual tasks like blueprint cross-referencing and scientific chart reading, unlike text-only evaluations
    • Gemini 4 Carbon ranks second at one-sixth the average cost per task of the top model
    • The benchmark was co-built by DeepMind and Artificial Analysis and is now integrated into the Artificial Analysis platform