Keenable Search 1.0 登顶搜索指数榜 单次成本低三分之一
Keenable Search 1.0 在 Artificial Analysis 搜索指数中，pro 模式以 83 分登顶、realtime 模式以 82 分位列第二，双双超过 Exa 与 Perplexity 的 80 分。其每千次搜索定价 4 美元、单任务成本约 0.040 美元，比榜单中位数低三分之一以上，单任务耗时 15 秒左右，速度排名第二、第三。相比 8 月首次测评的 67 分，两个模式均提升约 15 分。
报道正文
Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys) · 2026-11-10 16
Keenable Search 1.0 takes 1st (pro, 83) and 2nd (realtime, 82) on the Artificial Analysis Search Index: ahead of Exa (auto, dynamic highlights) and Perplexity (medium) at 80
We benchmarked both modes of @KeenableAI's Keenable Search 1.0, pro and realtime, in our Stirrup agent harness with Keenable Search as its web_search tool to complete 1700 search-focused tasks.
At $4 per 1k searches, Keenable costs about $0.040 per task in both modes, over a third below the board median ($0.063). It is also one of the fastest products we measure: 15.0s (realtime) and 15.5s (pro) per task, 2nd and 3rd on the board.
Key benchmarking results for Keenable Search 1.0:
➤ Artificial Analysis Search Index: Keenable (pro) scores 83 and Keenable (realtime) 82, up from 67 for both modes when we first benchmarked Keenable in August, and a ~50-point lift over the same model with no search (33). Both lead Exa (auto, dynamic highlights) and Perplexity (medium) at 80
➤ DeepSearchQA is Keenable's strongest benchmark: both modes score 88 F1, 1st and 2nd of 26, ahead of Exa (auto, dynamic highlights) at 86. Pro also ranks 1st on BrowseComp (87%, level with Perplexity (medium)) and on AA-Omniscience (73%, level with Exa (auto, dynamic highlights) and Firecrawl)
➤ Fast search: realtime takes 2.3s of search time per task (2nd of 26) and pro 3.0s (3rd), against a board median of 12.5s. Each search returns in about 330ms (realtime) and 390ms (pro) on average
Key details:
➤ Setup: GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) in Stirrup, Keenable Search API with mode=realtime and mode=pro
➤ Pricing: $4 per 1k requests in both modes (public pay-as-you-go price)
➤ Cards: We disabled Keenable's search cards for testing (disable_cards=true)
