HOT RADAR
llmHEAT 77.3°

AI CURATED HOT STORY · 11/6/2026

Thinking Machines Releases Inkling 2 Small, Intelligence Index Score of 31 Rivals Gemini 3.8 Flash

9 reports archived8 independent sourcesupdated 11/7/2026, 05:41:38
Synthesis & Latest Updates
8 Sources Cross-Validated

Thinking Machines Lab released its second-generation model, Inkling 2 Small, on the same day it launched a new funding round. The model uses a sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 594B total parameters and only 17B activated, supports image input and variable reasoning intensity, and scores 31 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1—an 18-point improvement over its predecessor, Inkling Small, matching Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) and surpassing Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Technically, the model underwent four-stage pre-training and 9 days of joint reinforcement training, with significant gains in agentic tasks: AutomationBench-AA rose from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%, and HLE-Diamond from 12% to 29%. Coding ability is mixed: FrontierCode 2.0 scores 25% versus Claude Sonnet 5.5's 11%, but Terminal-Bench 4.0 is only 13% versus 30%. Pricing is $0.30/$1.00 per million input/output tokens, with cached input at $0.03. The model is initially available as closed weights via the Tinker platform, with plans to open full weights under Apache 2.0 next week after external safety testing and red-teaming.

If the open weights materialize, it would become the highest-scoring open-weight model outside China, significantly boosting the open-source ecosystem's competitiveness. Meanwhile, Thinking Machines is raising $50 million at a $40 billion pre-money valuation, down from a previous $50 billion attempt, indicating cautious capital markets. The parallel release and fundraising highlight the lab's dual pace of technical iteration and commercial expansion.

LATEST/Thinking Machines is raising $50 million at a $40 billion pre-money valuation alongside the Inkling 2 Small release, down from a previous $50 billion attempt. The model is initially closed via Tinker, with plans to open weights under Apache 2.0 next week, which would make it the highest-scoring open-weight model outside China.

Hourly heat curve

38 fully observed hours
Now
77.3
Peak
122.422:00
24h change
-37%

The line compares only sources observed throughout; gap hours are interpolated to keep the trend continuous.

Coverage timeline

Total 9 reports · Latest first
  1. The DecoderT2·78 pts
    • MoE architecture with 594B total and 17B active parameters scores 31 on the Intelligence Index, up 18 points from its predecessor
    • Agentic tasks improve markedly, but cost per task is six times higher with more output tokens
    • Initially proprietary via the Tinker platform, with Apache-licensed weights to follow, more permissive than Meta or Mistral licenses
  2. Marktechpost (@Marktechpost)T2·78 pts
    • 594B total parameters with only 17B active per token; sparse routing picks 8 of 384 experts across 48 layers
    • Scores 31 on the AA Intelligence Index and 86.3% on SWE-Bench Pro v2, but only 13.1% on Terminal-Bench, showing uneven capability
    • Available now on Tinker for fine-tuning and inference at $0.30/$1.00 per 1M tokens; weights remain closed for now
  3. Artificial AnalysisT1·72 pts
    • Scores 31 on the Intelligence Index, up 18 points from Inkling Small and level with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
    • Large agentic gains: AutomationBench-AA rises from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%
    • Coding profile diverges: 25% on FrontierCode 2.0 beats Claude Sonnet 5.5, but 13% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 trails its 30%
    • Currently proprietary with weights pending; if released, it would be the top open-weights model outside China
  4. Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)T1·74 pts
    • Scores 31 on the Intelligence Index, up 18 points from Inkling Small and level with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high), ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro
    • Large agentic gains: AutomationBench-AA rises from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%, and HLE-Diamond from 12% to 29%
    • Coding profile differs from Claude Sonnet 5.5: 25% vs 11% on FrontierCode 2.0, but 13% vs 30% on Terminal-Bench 4.0
    • Priced at $0.30/$1.00 per 1M input/output tokens ($0.03 cached input), available first-party via Tinker at launch